Heat pump incentives in India: which government schemes actually apply to your factory
Accelerated depreciation on an industrial heat pump in India is 40 percent on the written down value. That rate has applied since the Finance Act 2017.
Heat pumps are named explicitly in the depreciation schedule, at Appendix I, item 8(ix) of the Income Tax Rules, under waste heat recovery equipment. A buyer’s finance team does not have to argue the classification by analogy.
The other instrument worth knowing about is ADEETIE, which runs to FY2027-28. It carries a 5 percent interest subvention for micro and small enterprises, and 3 percent for medium ones. It also funds the investment-grade energy audit and the detailed project report.
Which incentives actually apply to a mid-size Indian factory?
It is worth sorting the list before you read it. Most articles on this subject present eight instruments as though they carried equal weight. For a plant of ordinary size, only two of them make any real difference.
There are three groups. The first is tied to being a Designated Consumer or a notified obligated entity. It holds PAT, energy saving certificates and the compliance arm of the Carbon Credit Trading Scheme. Most factories are not in that group.
The second is tied to MSME status and a notified cluster, and it holds ADEETIE and the live state energy schemes. Many factories are in that group and have never checked. The third is open to every taxpaying entity, and the depreciation shield is the only material instrument in it.
| Instrument | Who it applies to | What it gives | Live in 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accelerated depreciation | Every taxpaying entity that buys the equipment | A tax shield on the accelerated portion of the written down value | Live |
| ADEETIE | MSMEs with a Udyam ID in a notified cluster | Interest subvention, plus a funded investment-grade audit, detailed project report, and monitoring and verification | Live to FY2027-28 |
| PAT and energy saving certificates | Designated Consumers only | Tradable certificates against a notified target | Legacy, folding into the Carbon Credit Trading Scheme |
| CCTS compliance | Notified obligated sectors only | Tradable carbon credit certificates against a target | Live for those sectors only |
| CCTS offsets | The route a non-obligated plant would use | Credits for a verified reduction | Announced, not operational |
| State MSME energy schemes | MSMEs, in three states | Part of the audit cost and part of the cost of equipment the audit recommends | Live in Gujarat, Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra |
| Concessional energy-efficiency finance | Borrowers who can produce a detailed energy audit and a vetted project report | A lower cost of capital on the project loan | Live |
| PLI for White Goods | Component manufacturers, not factory buyers | Production-linked payments to the manufacturer | Live, and of no use to a buyer |
Read the table as a filter, not a menu. The rows below the second are worth knowing mainly so you stop looking for them. The money in this decision is on the fuel side, not the scheme side. What has happened to industrial gas prices moves the case far more than anything in this list.
How much depreciation can I actually claim on a heat pump?
You can claim 40 percent on the written down value, within the block of assets that the equipment falls into. This rate has been in force since the Finance Act 2017, and it is the rate that a return filed today would use.
Two caveats belong in the same breath, because they are what a finance head will ask.
The first is that 40 percent written down value is not a 40 percent subsidy. The benefit is a tax shield on the accelerated portion. What the company receives is the deferred tax on that deduction, not two-fifths of the invoice. It is worth materially less than the headline rate reads.
Any vendor arithmetic that treats the depreciation rate as a discount on the purchase price is wrong. That is how a proposal loses credibility in the first finance review.
The second is the interaction between the accelerated rate and the concessional corporate tax regime. That is a question for your own tax advisor, not for a vendor page. Take the schedule reference below to your advisor and ask it directly. The conversation is short once the classification is settled, and the classification is the part that is usually contested.
Indirect tax works as a mechanism, not an incentive. GST charged on the equipment is creditable for a manufacturer, so it sits in working capital and never becomes a cost. Depreciation delivers a tax shield and no cash at all. Neither is a subsidy, and both get modelled in the direction that flatters the project more often than not.
Are heat pumps actually named in the tax schedule, or is this an interpretation?
They are named explicitly. The entry appears in the schedule itself, so nothing has to be inferred from a general category.
Income Tax Rules 1962, Appendix I, Table Part A, Machinery and Plant, item 8(ix) covers energy saving devices. Under it sits a sub-heading for waste heat recovery equipment. The entry reads: economisers and feed water heaters; recuperators and air pre-heaters; heat pumps; thermal energy wheel.
| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| Schedule reference | Income Tax Rules 1962, Appendix I, Table Part A, Machinery and Plant, item 8(ix) |
| Heading | Energy saving devices, sub-heading Waste heat recovery equipment |
| Entry | (a) Economisers and feed water heaters (b) Recuperators and air pre-heaters (c) Heat pumps (d) Thermal energy wheel |
| Rate | 40 percent on the written down value |
Item (c) is the whole point. A buyer’s chartered accountant does not have to argue that a heat pump is an energy saving device by analogy. It is on the list by name.
Eligibility here follows the equipment class in the schedule. It does not follow a star rating, a label or an efficiency certificate. Any page telling you otherwise has confused industrial plant with domestic appliances.
What is ADEETIE and does it cover the sector I am in?
ADEETIE stands for Assistance for Deployment of Energy Efficient Technologies in Industries and Establishments. The Ministry of Power runs it with BEE, through a portal operated by EESL.
Some plants are too small for PAT and too large to ignore their energy bill. For those, it is the most useful live instrument above.
| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| Owner | Ministry of Power with BEE, portal run by EESL |
| Period | FY2025-26 to FY2027-28 |
| Interest subvention | 5 percent for micro and small enterprises, 3 percent for medium |
| What else it funds | The investment-grade energy audit, the detailed project report, and monitoring and verification |
| Coverage | 60 clusters across 14 sectors |
| Eligibility | An MSME with a Udyam ID in a notified cluster |
| Condition | Demonstrate 10 percent energy saving from the technology installed |
In five of the 14 covered sectors, process heat below the steam range is a real load. Those five are chemical, food processing, pharma, paper and textile.
The subvention is the part that gets quoted, and it is the smaller half of the scheme. Funding the investment-grade audit and the project report matters more. It attacks the barrier that actually stops these projects. The finance function cannot evaluate a thermal proposal on its own, so it does not act on one.
That design has a consequence worth understanding before you approach anybody. The scheme pays an empanelled third-party auditor to produce the audit and to write the project report that specifies the technology. For an MSME, the technology choice is therefore often settled inside the audit, well before a purchase order exists. It is the auditor who applies the scheme’s eligible technology list, not the buyer. If you are working through this route, the conversation to have early is with the auditor who will write your report, not with a supplier.
One note to keep the section in proportion. Around 71 percent of the funds available under TEQUP, the predecessor scheme, went unused. Indian MSMEs do not convert available subsidy into adoption on their own. A subsidy is a reason to start the conversation, not a reason to buy.
Does the state my plant sits in matter more than any subsidy?
Usually, yes. The landed price of industrial electricity varies more across Indian states than any capped equipment subsidy is worth. It is also the number a heat pump case runs on, every hour for the life of the asset.
| State and licensee | Category | Energy charge | Demand charge | Landed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maharashtra, MSEDCL | HT-I | ₹8.44 per kVAh | ₹650 per kVA per month | Add duty and any time-of-day adjustment |
| Gujarat, GUVNL | HT-I | ₹4.30 per unit | Not separately verified | ₹7.50 to ₹8.50 once FPPPA, demand charges and duty are added |
| Tamil Nadu, TANGEDCO | HT industrial | ₹7.50 per kWh | ₹608 per kVA per month | Plus 5 percent electricity tax |
| Karnataka, BESCOM and the other ESCOMs | HT-2(a) | ₹6.70 per unit plus 35 paise surcharge | ₹365 per kVA per month | About ₹7.05 before duty |
| Uttar Pradesh, UPPCL | LMV-6, Small and Medium Power | ₹9.02 per unit average billing rate | Not verified | Already all-in |
Two rows carry conditions that change what they mean. The Uttar Pradesh figure is the LMV-6 Small and Medium Power category, not a large HT industrial tariff. It is not the rate a big plant in that state would pay.
And Maharashtra bills HT-I per kVAh, not per kWh. A plant running poor power factor pays more per useful unit than ₹8.44 suggests. That figure is a kVAh rate, and it should never be carried into a per-kWh calculation.
The Maharashtra row holds one more fact, and it runs against what most buyers assume. The regulator has approved a declining HT-I path, from ₹8.44 per kVAh in FY2026-27 to ₹7.45 by FY2029-30.
That is a five-year approved reduction in the price of the input a heat pump runs on, recorded in a public tariff order. To a fifteen-year asset it is worth more than any scheme above it on this page. It is also the opposite of the assumption that electricity in India only ever gets dearer.
Gujarat readers have one more line to put in the model. A cross-subsidy surcharge of ₹1.33 per kWh applies for FY2026-27. So does wheeling at ₹0.2352 per unit with 6.5 percent losses. Both apply to any open-access or captive-solar arrangement sitting alongside the machine. Both are large enough to move the answer and both are routinely forgotten.
Do PAT and energy saving certificates apply to my plant?
For most plants they almost certainly do not apply. It is far better to establish that at the outset than after a month of reading.
PAT applies to Designated Consumers, and the threshold is 30,000 MTOE of annual energy consumption for most sectors. That is a very large plant. A mid-size paint, chemical, food or pharmaceutical unit is not close to it.
One test settles it. If nobody at your company has ever been legally required to appoint a certified energy manager, you are not a Designated Consumer.
PAT is also being folded into the Carbon Credit Trading Scheme as its compliance segment, so it is winding down. Some content still presents energy saving certificates as a way for a mid-market factory to fund equipment. That mechanism never applied to that factory, and it is now being retired.
Can I monetise carbon credits from a heat pump?
For most plants, this is not possible at present.
CCTS compliance applies only to notified sectors, and most industries a heat pump serves sit outside that perimeter. The offset mechanism is the route a non-obligated plant would have to use, and it is announced, not operational. So there is no carbon revenue to put in the model. A proposal that includes one is carrying a number that cannot be collected.
Document the project properly anyway: a defensible baseline of what the displaced fuel actually consumed, metering on the new plant, and a stated measurement method. That documentation is what would make any future claim possible, and it is what an energy manager needs whether or not a credit ever materialises.
What state schemes exist, and are they still live?
Three states currently run something usable. The names of these instruments have changed over time. Any page that cites the older policies is pointing you towards something that has since lapsed.
In Gujarat, the energy and water conservation assistance now sits under the Aatmanirbhar Gujarat Scheme for Assistance to MSMEs. It reimburses part of the cost of an energy audit, and part of the cost of equipment the audit recommends. It is open to MSMEs only, and the claim is tied to the audit, not to the invoice.
Tamil Nadu’s PEACE scheme has the same shape. MSME only, and audit-led. An empanelled or accredited auditor carries out the audit, and the equipment claim follows its recommendation. Because it is audit-led it interacts directly with the ADEETIE point above, and the same practical conclusion applies. The auditor is the person whose report decides what gets specified.
Maharashtra’s current industrial policy replaced PSI 2019. Its benefits depend on the area category, not on the technology, so what matters is where you build and not what you install. It suits a greenfield plant or an expansion; a utility retrofit gets little out of it.
Is financing a better lever than a subsidy?
For most mid-market buyers it is. Financing changes the way a project gets approved. A subsidy only changes what the project costs, and rarely by a margin large enough to matter.
Incentives improve a good payback. They do not create one.
Against gas, LPG, furnace oil and diesel the breakeven COP for an industrial heat pump is 1.0 to 1.2. The running-cost case either stands on its own arithmetic or it does not stand at all. No scheme on this page closes a gap that size.
Against coal and biomass the argument is compliance, air quality, labour and customer audit, not fuel cost. No subsidy changes that either. The worked comparison against a boiler is where the payback itself is calculated.
The two levers that actually move a deal are the depreciation shield and access to concessional energy-efficiency finance.
Concessional lending for energy efficiency is available in India. It is gated on a detailed energy audit by an empanelled auditor, and a project report vetted by the lender’s energy efficiency cell. That gate is also why the funded-audit provisions matter more than a capped equipment subsidy. They produce the document the lender requires.
Sometimes the obstacle is not the payback, but getting any capital sanction at all. We also offer a shared savings, or ESCO, arrangement. The supplier funds and installs the system and is paid from the savings it produces, on terms settled project by project.
The failure mode this addresses is not the one people expect. The documented pattern in Indian industry is not that the finance function rejects energy efficiency proposals. It is that the finance department is not equipped to evaluate a thermal intervention technically, so approvals sit.
Buyers say they want a payback of 1 to 3 years. The realised payback across 224 Indian MSMEs in a World Bank study was 44 months. Treat the stated preference as a screening filter, not a hurdle rate. The real gate is whether the finance function can audit your numbers unaided. A clear ROI method they can check line by line does more for a proposal than any scheme.
What does a heat pump avoid that no scheme pays for?
It avoids the recurring cost of running a registered boiler. This is a genuine advantage over steam, and it appears in almost no vendor comparison.
Below 100°C a hot water loop is not a registered boiler under the Indian Boiler Regulations. Registration turns on temperature and pressure, not on the technology, and below that line the equipment is a hot water generator. What falls away with the registration is not the statutory fee, which is small enough that leading with it would be unserious. It is the operating burden.
Three parts of that burden cost real money every year. A registered boiler needs a certified attendant on every shift, with relief cover, and the rules on who may relieve whom are strict.
Replacing an attendant who leaves is gated by an examination calendar, not by the labour market. That is an availability risk most plants discover only once. And the annual inspection requires a shutdown, with the production lost in it, every year for the life of the plant. The Boilers Act 2025 has since tightened accredited training and certification for boiler operators, which makes running one more onerous, not less.
The caveat matters here, because a blanket claim would be wrong and the customer would pay for it. Above 100°C the position depends on vessel design and volume, and on the view of the state Boiler Directorate. It is not a blanket exemption at every duty. Scope it to the loop you are actually converting.
We build air source, water source and cascade configurations for industrial process heat. Where a duty can be met with a hot water loop held below 100°C, that loop sits outside boiler registration entirely. The equipment and how it integrates is described here.
What to do next, in order
There are five steps, and they should be taken in this sequence, because each one narrows down the next.
- Establish whether your plant is a Designated Consumer. If it is not, everything in the PAT and compliance-carbon family drops off your list.
- Establish your Udyam registration status and whether your location falls in a notified cluster. That determines whether the MSME instruments, including the funded audit route, are open to your sector at all.
- Get the delivered cost of heat from your own fuel bill, not from a published average. You need your contracted fuel rate and the calorific value on your invoice. You also need your boiler’s efficiency, and your landed electricity tariff including demand charges and duty.
- Run the arithmetic before you run the scheme search. The calculator will do the division. If the running-cost case does not stand without a subsidy, no subsidy on this page will rescue it.
- Take the schedule reference from this page to your tax advisor. Settle the depreciation treatment for your entity, and how your corporate tax regime affects it.
If the arithmetic works and the next question is about your own load profile instead of schemes, you can get that started here.
Disclaimer. Government schemes and rates change. This page describes the position as at August 2026, from publicly available sources. Verify current eligibility, rates and application procedure with BEE, the relevant state portal and the tax authorities before committing capital. Take tax and legal advice specific to your own entity.
Frequently asked questions
- What rate of accelerated depreciation applies to an industrial heat pump in India?
- You can claim 40 percent on the written down value. This rate has been in force since the Finance Act 2017. It is not a 40 percent subsidy. The cash benefit is the tax shield on the accelerated portion, which is worth materially less than the headline rate suggests.
- Are heat pumps named in the Income Tax depreciation schedule?
- Yes, by name. Income Tax Rules 1962, Appendix I, Table Part A, Machinery and Plant, item 8(ix) covers energy saving devices. Its waste heat recovery equipment sub-heading lists economisers and feed water heaters, recuperators and air pre-heaters, heat pumps, and thermal energy wheel. Eligibility follows the equipment class in the schedule, not a star rating.
- Can a factory that is not a Designated Consumer earn ESCerts?
- No. PAT and its energy saving certificates apply only to Designated Consumers. The threshold is 30,000 MTOE of annual energy consumption for most sectors, and a mid-size chemical, food, paint or pharmaceutical plant is nowhere near it. Most heat pump incentives that reach a plant of that size come from the depreciation schedule and from MSME instruments instead.
- Does ADEETIE pay for the energy audit?
- Yes. Alongside its interest subvention, ADEETIE funds the investment-grade energy audit, the detailed project report and monitoring and verification for eligible MSMEs in notified clusters. The scheme runs from FY2025-26 to FY2027-28 and is operated by the Ministry of Power with BEE, through a portal run by EESL.